In approximately half of US states, new laws explicitly exempt direct primary care (DPC) arrangements from insurance regulation. These laws often apply to a narrow scope of arrangements and require providers to build patient protections into their contracts – such as clear cancellation and refund terms.
While these new laws provide certainty for some providers, questions remain:
- How could these arrangements be regulated in states that have not passed DPC laws?
- How might regulators think about arrangements that are close to, but fall outside of, those described in the state laws (such as arrangements covering certain types of specialty care)?